#command-updates

^ self explanatory (the majority targets mentioned are minors)

@everyone

I didn’t think this needed to be stated once more, as a-lot of the screenshots speak for themselves but it is clearly shown that Raynard has broken atleast more than 1 or 2 laws, in the country which the incident had taken place, and the country he resides in as a citizen.

It is indisputable to denote that he has not broken a law, as Aleczaender has tried to do in my DM’s but failed to address and instead diverted the topic to bad actors holding the default role in this server; which previously in the conversation I had stated that I had no association to and would be completely fine in removing these bad actors that had committed absurdly questionable acts in the recent weeks.

If people were not held accountable to criminal action, then life would be nasty brutish and short; as Hobbes would say. We shouldn’t give exceptions or concoct excuses for this conduct. Espically in a community and genre of primarily minors. I have even taken the liberty to outline the facts and principles to put things into legal perspective, along with Aleczaender’s defence, which is proven insufficient in the facts standalone.

D’s conduct can be characterised as doxxing in the ordinary sense, given the deliberate collection and circulation of V2’s personal information without her knowledge or consent. The impact of this conduct must be distinguished from D’s intention: irrespective of whether D originally intended to intimidate V, the disclosure resulted in V, a minor, experiencing fear and distress upon learning of the investigation. While this establishes the alleged intimidating impact of D’s actions, the separate evidence of discussions about confronting V with the information and wanted to find face pics of his aunt would support an inference that intimidation was also an intended consequence.

Case Facts

D = Raynard
V = “John Doe” (Minor)
V2 = “Jane Doe” (Aunt)

D is accused of unlawfully obtaining, retaining and disclosing personal information contrary to Section 170 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

D initially attempted to obtain personal information concerning V, a minor, before identifying V’s aunt (V2) through online profiles and associated connections. Using paid intelligence services, D obtained V2’s residential address, telephone numbers, email addresses and family details.

D subsequently stored and circulated screenshots of this information within group chats containing up to 10 individuals some of which were from the United Kingdom, including the D himself, accompanied by the sarcastic remark, “I wonder who this is.” By V2 was unaware of the collection and disclosure.

Furthermore, one of D’s accomplices (Aleczaender) remarked, “He is panicking, he thinks he is next,” referring to V, suggesting that those involved were aware of the fear and distress their actions had caused the minor, yet continued their investigation into V2 regardless.

Voice recordings ( https://discord.com/channels/1507527219772129320/1567605565541318887/1567648474508300350 ) allegedly show D proposing to introduce V2’s information into a group chat containing V, potentially to intimidate him. Another recording captures D discussing the need to “esculate the information” and obtain photographs of V2, why would the D need photos of the relative if they had pure intentions?

V subsequently learned of the investigation and became frightened that he would be targeted next. D allegedly acknowledged and mocked this fear, yet continued investigating V2 after initially obtaining her correct contact details.

D maintains that the information was collected to contact V’s parents to prevent disruption to their online community. However, V2 was not V’s primary legal guardian, and the subsequent circulation, proposed intimidation and continued investigation raise questions about the credibility of this justification.

Potential offences: Section 170 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (unlawful obtaining, disclosure or retention of personal data) and Sections 2 and 2A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (harassment or stalking), subject to proof of their respective statutory elements.

Raynard has still yet to been removed, even after hearing word Aleczaender was confronted in a GC about it and proceeded to ghost them entirely after Raynard was mentioned.

RAYNARDRICHTERIAN, DOXING AND DEGENERACY

2IC of Octavium Imperium, Aleczaender's right hand man.
@everyone

RaynardRichterian, also known in this exhibit as "jerrydonald27" (his alternative account), displays him storing and sending personal identifying information of a confirmed minor. His identity is proven through the recording linked below of him in VC on the jerrydonald27 account along with additional screenshots referring to his alt. Raynard knows this is wrong, hence why he uses a different alias to mask himself and the actions he commits (well, he tried to) whilst paying no reparations . He is currently, and has been for a long time, Aleczaender's right hand man and Co-Leading the Octavium Project. We have seen previously what he has so foolishly done publicly on his main account, which is grounds for complete removal either way. The matter at hand is this:

If this was a random john doe, a random division commander per se, that had been caught doxing and being an overall degenerate on both his main and alternative account. Aleczaender would remove him no questions asked, at least you'd assume so right? Would it not be the most sensible, logical and pragmatic thing to do, right? What makes Raynard so different? Why does Raynard get special passes to dox minors without punishment?

I call for the removal of RaynardRichterian, who is plaguing the genre with his com-skid kid persona and criminal behaviour, and if, with all evidence considered he is not removed Aleczaender would only prove himself to be as worse as Raynard himself.

Since it is well known that Raynard lives in the UK, i will be providing primary precedent for his actions; using the laws of his own country:

Data Protection Act 2018 – Section 170

Knowingly or recklessly obtaining, disclosing or retaining personal data without the data controller's consent can constitute a criminal offence, subject to the statutory exceptions.

Computer Misuse Act 1990

Unauthorised access to another person's information, accounts or computer can constitute a criminal offence.

More stuff will be released when I’m home tonight.

As we stated this is claimed by sources, we do not confirm he has done what people claim; take this with a grain of salt.

@everyone

DIXIERICHTERIAN CONTINUUM

Below showcases DixieRichterian engaging with a 15 year old female on his personal instagram account, in this transcript we can see a grown adult in his early twenties frequently exchanging messages with this 15 year old. In one of the screenshots he displays complete inappropriate conduct with a minor, by sending sexual "femboy" content where the figure is presented as half naked.

The question we should be asking is why is a man in his early 20's engaging in frequent and inappropriate conversations with a minor at all? For What reason could he possibly have given his personal Instagram to this child? And why is he still in Aleczaender's group as a senior officer?

Aleczaender has claimed that Dixie has rehabilitated from his old degenerate ways just 10 minutes ago to me, it seems he has once again misjudged his command.

There is also an entry within the compile displaying Dixie engaging and sending sexually driven reels to a 15 year old girl in a group chat

The attachment linked shows no sexually graphic content, advisory for the audio.

Multiple sources from our Intelligence have claimed and ciphered that this is the Graend Director of Zaenderism, DixieRichterian, engaging in sexual activities with what we can only conclude is a male; setting the example for all Zaenderists to come!

DIXIERICHTERIAN, DEPUTY LEGATE

This has been a long dismissed and due issue within Octavium, it was one of the reasons @Fartybombarty ᛉ was kicked for trying to shed light on this, though he never had the platform to bring this to light. The reason why Dixie was defended upon this affair was due to the fact he had recently bought the “RWW2” server at the time, and Aleczaender wanted to use it to create a community. (Which inevitably failed)

@DixieRichterian , commonly known as Dixie, has been a long time member of Octavium. He is also a degenerate. Dixie has been seen countless times drinking in VC’s with cam on Infront of children. At this moment, he sits at the position of Deputy Legate and Graend Director of Zaenderism, the head of Zaenderist Ideological Affairs, setting the role model for all future Zaenderist generations! He is also the former Legate of Octavium before I had approved him to be couped for his drinking and general misconduct.

Aleczaender is well aware of what Dixie does and has been briefed by his command including the current Legate, Generalwhite. Though he has yet to take any action, hopefully this issue being pressed on will allow Aleczaender to do the right thing.

We also have a very suggestive video of Dixie that we will not be releasing to the public at the moment, but in due time.

private dms between raynard and alec